<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Time and Quantum Mechanics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://timeandquantummechanics.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://timeandquantummechanics.com</link>
	<description>Exploring the intersection of time and quantum mechanics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2011 19:03:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Not your grandfather&#8217;s gravity by John Ashmead</title>
		<link>http://timeandquantummechanics.com/2011/05/27/not-your-grandfathers-gravity/comment-page-1/#comment-244</link>
		<dc:creator>John Ashmead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2011 19:03:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timeandquantummechanics.com/?p=860#comment-244</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m glad you enjoyed the panel.  For reading on multi-worlds &amp; higher dimensional physics you might try:

Kaku - Parallel Worlds - 2005
Randall - Warped Passages - 2005
Susskind - Cosmic Landscape - 2006
Barrow - New Theories of Everything - 2007
Green - Hidden Reality - 2011

Probably enough reading!  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad you enjoyed the panel.  For reading on multi-worlds &#038; higher dimensional physics you might try:</p>
<p>Kaku &#8211; Parallel Worlds &#8211; 2005<br />
Randall &#8211; Warped Passages &#8211; 2005<br />
Susskind &#8211; Cosmic Landscape &#8211; 2006<br />
Barrow &#8211; New Theories of Everything &#8211; 2007<br />
Green &#8211; Hidden Reality &#8211; 2011</p>
<p>Probably enough reading!  <img src='http://timeandquantummechanics.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Not your grandfather&#8217;s gravity by Kelle</title>
		<link>http://timeandquantummechanics.com/2011/05/27/not-your-grandfathers-gravity/comment-page-1/#comment-243</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2011 16:11:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timeandquantummechanics.com/?p=860#comment-243</guid>
		<description>Hi John,

I enjoyed your (Really) Hard Science for Beginners panel at Balticon last weekend. We spoke briefly afterward but since you were on your way to another session, you told me to send you an e-mail.

I&#039;m looking for some resources that explain multi-world theory and higher dimensional physics in a way that a layman can understand. I figure that&#039;s a tall order but I was hoping you might have some ideas on where I could look.

Thanks for your time.

Kelle Campbell</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi John,</p>
<p>I enjoyed your (Really) Hard Science for Beginners panel at Balticon last weekend. We spoke briefly afterward but since you were on your way to another session, you told me to send you an e-mail.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m looking for some resources that explain multi-world theory and higher dimensional physics in a way that a layman can understand. I figure that&#8217;s a tall order but I was hoping you might have some ideas on where I could look.</p>
<p>Thanks for your time.</p>
<p>Kelle Campbell</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Not your grandfather&#8217;s gravity by John Ashmead</title>
		<link>http://timeandquantummechanics.com/2011/05/27/not-your-grandfathers-gravity/comment-page-1/#comment-242</link>
		<dc:creator>John Ashmead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 19:02:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timeandquantummechanics.com/?p=860#comment-242</guid>
		<description>Hi Tom,

I&#039;ve looked at the nullphysics.com website, particularly at the intergalactic redshift paper (http://www.ourundiscovereduniverse.com/downloads/whitepaper2.pdf).  There are three problems with this paper:

1) it does not appear to have been published in a peer-reviewed journal. 

2) it assume the steady state universe, but does not address some of the very serious problems with that theory.  As the wikipedia article on the steady state puts it:

&quot;Problems with the steady-state theory began to emerge in the late 1960s, when observations apparently supported the idea that the universe was in fact changing: quasars and radio galaxies were found only at large distances (therefore existing only in the distant past), not in closer galaxies. Whereas the Big Bang theory predicted as much, Steady State predicted that such objects would be found everywhere, including close to our own galaxy.&quot;

3) it is incomplete:  Witt expounds his theory at length but does not appear to give any observational tests to discriminate between his &quot;null hypothesis&quot; and the Big Bang.  No tests means no point.

Given the extensive tests of the redshift &amp; the Big Bang theory, the burden of proof is on Witt to prove that his theory is better.  He hasn&#039;t even started.

Thanks for letting me know about this, 

Best,

John</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tom,</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve looked at the nullphysics.com website, particularly at the intergalactic redshift paper (<a href="http://www.ourundiscovereduniverse.com/downloads/whitepaper2.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.ourundiscovereduniverse.com/downloads/whitepaper2.pdf</a>).  There are three problems with this paper:</p>
<p>1) it does not appear to have been published in a peer-reviewed journal. </p>
<p>2) it assume the steady state universe, but does not address some of the very serious problems with that theory.  As the wikipedia article on the steady state puts it:</p>
<p>&#8220;Problems with the steady-state theory began to emerge in the late 1960s, when observations apparently supported the idea that the universe was in fact changing: quasars and radio galaxies were found only at large distances (therefore existing only in the distant past), not in closer galaxies. Whereas the Big Bang theory predicted as much, Steady State predicted that such objects would be found everywhere, including close to our own galaxy.&#8221;</p>
<p>3) it is incomplete:  Witt expounds his theory at length but does not appear to give any observational tests to discriminate between his &#8220;null hypothesis&#8221; and the Big Bang.  No tests means no point.</p>
<p>Given the extensive tests of the redshift &#038; the Big Bang theory, the burden of proof is on Witt to prove that his theory is better.  He hasn&#8217;t even started.</p>
<p>Thanks for letting me know about this, </p>
<p>Best,</p>
<p>John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Not your grandfather&#8217;s gravity by tom flink</title>
		<link>http://timeandquantummechanics.com/2011/05/27/not-your-grandfathers-gravity/comment-page-1/#comment-240</link>
		<dc:creator>tom flink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 20:10:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timeandquantummechanics.com/?p=860#comment-240</guid>
		<description>Hi John, I talked to you after your Balticon talk about the Hubble red shift. Here is a  link to the white paper I mentioned. www.nullphysics.com. click on intergalactic redshift pdf. Please read it to the end.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi John, I talked to you after your Balticon talk about the Hubble red shift. Here is a  link to the white paper I mentioned. <a href="http://www.nullphysics.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.nullphysics.com</a>. click on intergalactic redshift pdf. Please read it to the end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Not your grandfather&#8217;s gravity by John Ashmead</title>
		<link>http://timeandquantummechanics.com/2011/05/27/not-your-grandfathers-gravity/comment-page-1/#comment-239</link>
		<dc:creator>John Ashmead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 10:41:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timeandquantummechanics.com/?p=860#comment-239</guid>
		<description>Thanks Walt!  I&#039;ve fixed.  Once again, never put in a link without testing it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Walt!  I&#8217;ve fixed.  Once again, never put in a link without testing it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Not your grandfather&#8217;s gravity by waltman</title>
		<link>http://timeandquantummechanics.com/2011/05/27/not-your-grandfathers-gravity/comment-page-1/#comment-238</link>
		<dc:creator>waltman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 22:21:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timeandquantummechanics.com/?p=860#comment-238</guid>
		<description>The links for the pdf and keynote are broken -- you left off the &quot;.com&quot; from your domain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The links for the pdf and keynote are broken &#8212; you left off the &#8220;.com&#8221; from your domain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Put your minds in full upright position by Singing Machine Karaoke &#124; What does It mean to &#8220;observe&#8221; in quantum experiments? &#124; Karaoke Songs &#38; Machine</title>
		<link>http://timeandquantummechanics.com/2010/06/18/put-your-minds-in-full-upright-position/comment-page-1/#comment-235</link>
		<dc:creator>Singing Machine Karaoke &#124; What does It mean to &#8220;observe&#8221; in quantum experiments? &#124; Karaoke Songs &#38; Machine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 01:02:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timeandquantummechanics.com/?p=816#comment-235</guid>
		<description>[...] Time and Quantum Mechanics &#187; Put your minds in full upright position [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Time and Quantum Mechanics &raquo; Put your minds in full upright position [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on On the nature of time &amp; quantum mechanics by Tweets that mention Time and Quantum Mechanics » On the nature of time &#38; quantum mechanics -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://timeandquantummechanics.com/2010/05/28/on-the-nature-of-time-quantum-mechanics/comment-page-1/#comment-231</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Time and Quantum Mechanics » On the nature of time &#38; quantum mechanics -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 21:41:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timeandquantummechanics.com/?p=737#comment-231</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Robert P Reibold, John Ashmead. John Ashmead said: And I&#039;ve put the slides from tomorrow&#039;s talk &quot;The nature of time and quantum mechanics&quot; up on my blog: http://bit.ly/9m7xOO [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Robert P Reibold, John Ashmead. John Ashmead said: And I&#39;ve put the slides from tomorrow&#39;s talk &quot;The nature of time and quantum mechanics&quot; up on my blog: <a href="http://bit.ly/9m7xOO" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/9m7xOO</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dissertation complete by Time and Quantum Mechanics » Dissertation complete &#124; Quantum Physics Material Geek</title>
		<link>http://timeandquantummechanics.com/2010/04/28/dissertation-complete/comment-page-1/#comment-224</link>
		<dc:creator>Time and Quantum Mechanics » Dissertation complete &#124; Quantum Physics Material Geek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 08:14:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timeandquantummechanics.com/?p=719#comment-224</guid>
		<description>[...] Follow this link: Time and Quantum Mechanics » Dissertation complete [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Follow this link: Time and Quantum Mechanics » Dissertation complete [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on References by Time and Quantum Mechanics &#187; Paradox Noise</title>
		<link>http://timeandquantummechanics.com/references/comment-page-1/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>Time and Quantum Mechanics &#187; Paradox Noise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 20:36:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timeandquantummechanics.com/?page_id=569#comment-38</guid>
		<description>[...] References [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] References [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
